Top 10 YouTube Science & Technology trends in November 2026

Product reviews lead YouTube Science & Technology trends in November 2026, while electric vehicles offer creators a focused opportunity: Turn a spectacular demonstration into a testable ownership question.

YouTube Science & Technology trends by the numbers

This November 2 snapshot covers a current 30-day window within Science & Technology. Counts describe the analysed sample, rather than every YouTube upload. A video can appear in several topics, so adding the rows would overcount the audience. The table preserves the reported rank order and exact topic names.

The revenue estimates are consistent with approximately $1.50 per 1,000 views across all ten topics. Their differences reflect reach within that model, rather than different earning rates or verified creator income. YouTube’s RPM explanation distinguishes revenue per thousand views from advertisers’ CPM. These estimates also do not establish how sponsorships affect any individual channel’s business.

Reviews hold first while the standalone smartphone topic falls

Product reviews stay #1. Electronics, computer hardware, artificial intelligence and gadgets each rise two places, while software development holds #8. Smartphone falls five places, the largest decline among topics present in both lists. Electric vehicles, board games and laptop technology enter the current Top 10 without baseline Top 10 ranks.

These are differently sized windows collected on the same date, rather than consecutive months. Product reviews have 136.51M views in the current window against 203.48M in the broader one. Artificial intelligence rises from #6 to #4 despite having 35.35M views against 89.07M. A higher position alone therefore does not establish demand or revenue growth.

Apple, engineering and wearable technology leave the standalone Top 10. That does not mean Apple disappears from the videos: Its promotional films and an iPhone review remain relevant examples within the current topics. The picture favours specific evaluation questions over a simple manufacturer league table. The October Science & Technology report provides the previous edition’s Apple-led context; its separate snapshot is not this edition’s 60-day baseline.

Product reviews turn a launch into an ownership question

Product reviews combine the broadest video sample in this Top 10 with its highest total reach and matched revenue estimate. Engagement here means likes divided by views, multiplied by 100; comments are separate. The examples include both brand promotion and independent assessment, so the topic’s total should not be read as demand for one uniform review format.

Apple’s MacBook Pro film builds a chain of imagined benefits around an OLED display, moving from the screen to touch, performance and portability. It is a compressed product promise. Marques Brownlee’s iPhone Duo review instead opens with the questions people have been asking him: Should they get a folding iPhone, and who is it for?

His answer develops through contrasts. He describes polished interactions around a first-generation device, then shows where the experience becomes less convincing. The hinge animation explains the unfolding screen; everyday apps reveal uneven adaptation to the larger display. Camera examples and reported use experience bring the product promise back to particular user needs.

The payoff is a segmented verdict rather than a universal recommendation. The video distinguishes someone who enjoys the new form from someone who mainly wants familiar phone tasks or particular camera capabilities. Those are the reviewer’s observations and conclusions in this episode, rather than independently reproduced measurements in this report. The transferable choice is to make each demonstration change the answer to the opening question.

Electric vehicles separate spectacle from usable evidence

Electric vehicles have a higher likes-to-views rate than product reviews, alongside their concentrated average reach. That supports a specific format experiment, but five videos cannot establish a typical result or the performance of every EV subject. The video-backed opportunity is interpreting a dramatic event through questions that remain after the demonstration ends.

CNET’s Roadster event highlights preserve the spectacle: A countdown, audience reactions, dramatic manoeuvres and presenters explaining the claimed mechanisms. The opening explicitly asks people present to witness what follows. That gives viewers an event to experience, but it does not make every claim a tested ownership fact.

Brownlee’s reaction begins with the same spectacle, then changes the question. He separates different proposed versions, discusses the fan system and thrusters, and asks what matters beyond the stage. Noise, practical use, safety and delivery become unresolved issues to examine. The episode’s value is the distinction between demonstration, manufacturer promise and interpretation; this report does not verify the vehicle specifications or availability claims.

The comparison with McMurtry gives the discussion a concrete technical reference. McMurtry documents an upside-down demonstration of its own fan-based downforce system. That illustrates a related mechanism; it does not validate another vehicle’s promised performance or road approval. A creator can use an established comparison to explain the physics while keeping separate claims separate.

Four videos that make the product promise answerable

These examples cover ownership assessment, interpretation after a launch, event spectacle and a strategy experiment. Their individual view counts describe the videos, while the earlier metrics describe topic aggregates. They are selected for the different ways they turn a claim or promise into a sequence the viewer can judge.

▶

13,240,060 views · Product reviews

iPhone Duo Review: First Generation Fun!

Why it matters: Marques Brownlee opens with who a folding iPhone is actually for. The review moves between polished interactions and compromises, using the unfolding animation, app behaviour and camera examples to test the product’s appeal for different people.

What to watch for: The ending separates potential users rather than giving everybody the same recommendation. Follow which observation changes the verdict. The episode’s usefulness comes from connecting the experience to a particular task, not merely displaying a new form factor.

▶

12,437,540 views · Electric vehicles

The NEW Tesla Roadster: My Honest Reaction

Why it matters: Brownlee starts with the Roadster spectacle, then separates the proposed versions and discusses what their mechanisms might mean beyond the stage. Questions about practical use, noise, safety and delivery turn a reaction into an interpretation.

What to watch for: He treats the proposed shipping date as a promise, rather than a completed result. The payoff is a clearer set of distinctions and remaining questions. His discussion is not a road test or independent validation of the announced performance.

▶

10,366,259 views · Electric vehicles

Tesla's Flying Roadster Revealed: Everything That Happened in 10 Minutes

Why it matters: CNET’s edited event footage gives the presentation a compact sequence: A countdown, demonstrations, audience reactions and explanations from the people on stage. The opening asks attendees to witness the spectacle, making their presence part of the framing.

What to watch for: Technical claims follow dramatic reveals, while a later production promise shifts from what is presented to what is planned. Compare that sequence with the reaction video’s practical questions; footage of an event and an ownership assessment serve different purposes.

▶

17,429,284 views · Board games

I Solved Every Board Game

Why it matters: Mark Rober introduces strategy research, gathers game results and takes the proposed advantages into public contests. A match against his former statistics teacher supplies a continuing question: Will the new preparation finally let him win?

What to watch for: The teacher has strategies Mark missed, and the final Hungry Hippos tiebreak ends in Mark’s defeat. That reversal gives the explanation a memorable limit and a human payoff, rather than treating the opening win-rate claim as a guarantee.

Across the four, context changes the meaning of a result. A feature can work while remaining unsuitable for a particular owner. A staged manoeuvre can be impressive without answering a delivery question. A strategy can be useful while still losing a match. Creators gain a stronger explanation by showing those boundaries rather than treating every reveal as a final answer.

What Science & Technology creators should prioritise and test

1. Prioritise: Product coverage built around one ownership question. Capture the task, the observed result and the limitation that changes your verdict, rather than relying on a specification recap.
2. Test: An EV explainer that moves from a striking demonstration to one practical question. Make clear which statements come from the presenter and which your evidence can actually establish.
3. Approach cautiously: One-video averages, promised shipping dates and clips that look like independent assessment but are brand promotion. Match your production plan to the evidence and access you can obtain.

Use the YouTube topic validation guide to check audience fit, then compare current category opportunities in the live trends dashboard. After publishing, YouTube’s audience-retention report can help you examine where viewers stay, skip or leave. Compare your own explanation and demonstration sections instead of treating topic reach as evidence of retention.

Viewers want help deciding what a technology claim means

The videos suggest two connected needs: Experiencing something new and understanding whether it matters. A launch supplies novelty; a useful review translates it into a task, constraint or decision. The distinction lets creators serve viewers who enjoyed the spectacle but still have an unanswered practical question.

That is an interpretation of the content alongside aggregate performance, rather than a direct measure of motivation or purchase intent. The smaller current smartphone topic does not make phone questions obsolete, just as the EV average does not make every launch a creator opportunity. The useful bet is a clear question supported by evidence your audience can inspect.